Aruba vs Malta: Protected terrestrial biodiversity sites
Aruba
93.75
in 2025
Malta
90.85
in 2025
Aruba rank
14th
Malta rank
16th
Protected terrestrial biodiversity sites over time
- Aruba
- Malta
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 93.75 against 90.85 in Malta, a difference of 2.9.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Malta ahead.
Aruba ranks 14th and Malta ranks 16th of 240 countries.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 18.52 | 83.51 | 64.99 | Malta |
| 2010s | 18.52 | 90.58 | 72.06 | Malta |
| 2020s | 56.13 | 90.85 | 34.71 | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protected terrestrial biodiversity sites, Aruba or Malta?
- Aruba, at 93.75 against 90.85 in Malta as of 2025.
- What is the difference in protected terrestrial biodiversity sites between Aruba and Malta?
- 2.9, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Malta?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Aruba and Malta rank globally for protected terrestrial biodiversity sites?
- Aruba ranks 14th and Malta ranks 16th of 240 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Protected terrestrial biodiversity sites. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.