Aruba vs Niue: Share of terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas that are protected
Aruba
93.8%
in 2025
Niue
95.3%
in 2025
Aruba rank
14th
Niue rank
11th
Share of terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas that are protected over time
- Aruba
- Niue
How they compare
Niue currently reports 95.3% against 93.8% in Aruba, a difference of 1.5%.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Niue has been ahead every year.
Aruba ranks 14th and Niue ranks 11th of 240 countries.
Niue has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Niue | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 18.5% | 95.3% | 76.8% | Niue |
| 2010s | 18.5% | 95.3% | 76.8% | Niue |
| 2020s | 56.1% | 95.3% | 39.1% | Niue |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of terrestrial key biodiversity areas that are protected, Aruba or Niue?
- Niue, at 95.3% against 93.8% in Aruba as of 2025.
- What is the difference in share of terrestrial key biodiversity areas that are protected between Aruba and Niue?
- 1.5%, with Niue ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Niue?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Aruba and Niue rank globally for share of terrestrial key biodiversity areas that are protected?
- Aruba ranks 14th and Niue ranks 11th of 240 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- BirdLife International, IUCN and UNEP-WCMC – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas that are protected. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%).