Australia vs Congo: Protected terrestrial biodiversity sites
Australia
57.73
in 2025
Congo
57.43
in 2025
Australia rank
83rd
Congo rank
86th
Protected terrestrial biodiversity sites over time
- Australia
- Congo
How they compare
Australia currently reports 57.73 against 57.43 in Congo, a difference of 0.3.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 83rd and Congo ranks 86th of 240 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 37.67 | 27.66 | 10.01 | Australia |
| 2010s | 51.16 | 43.89 | 7.27 | Australia |
| 2020s | 57.34 | 53.39 | 3.95 | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protected terrestrial biodiversity sites, Australia or Congo?
- Australia, at 57.73 against 57.43 in Congo as of 2025.
- What is the difference in protected terrestrial biodiversity sites between Australia and Congo?
- 0.3, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Congo?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Australia and Congo rank globally for protected terrestrial biodiversity sites?
- Australia ranks 83rd and Congo ranks 86th of 240 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Protected terrestrial biodiversity sites. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.