Australia vs Norfolk Island: Protected terrestrial biodiversity sites
Australia
57.73
in 2024
Norfolk Island
58.77
in 2024
Australia rank
82nd
Norfolk Island rank
79th
Protected terrestrial biodiversity sites over time
- Australia
- Norfolk Island
How they compare
Norfolk Island currently reports 58.77 against 57.73 in Australia, a difference of 1.04.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Norfolk Island has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 82nd and Norfolk Island ranks 79th of 238 countries.
Norfolk Island has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Norfolk Island | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 37.71 | 55.49 | 17.78 | Norfolk Island |
| 2010s | 51.19 | 56.15 | 4.96 | Norfolk Island |
| 2020s | 57.26 | 58.77 | 1.51 | Norfolk Island |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protected terrestrial biodiversity sites, Australia or Norfolk Island?
- Norfolk Island, at 58.77 against 57.73 in Australia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in protected terrestrial biodiversity sites between Australia and Norfolk Island?
- 1.04, with Norfolk Island ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Norfolk Island?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Australia and Norfolk Island rank globally for protected terrestrial biodiversity sites?
- Australia ranks 82nd and Norfolk Island ranks 79th of 238 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Protected terrestrial biodiversity sites. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.