Australia vs Norfolk Island: Protected terrestrial biodiversity sites
Australia
57.73
in 2025
Norfolk Island
58.77
in 2025
Australia rank
83rd
Norfolk Island rank
80th
Protected terrestrial biodiversity sites over time
- Australia
- Norfolk Island
How they compare
Norfolk Island currently reports 58.77 against 57.73 in Australia, a difference of 1.04.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Norfolk Island has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 83rd and Norfolk Island ranks 80th of 240 countries.
Norfolk Island has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Norfolk Island | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 37.67 | 55.49 | 17.82 | Norfolk Island |
| 2010s | 51.16 | 56.15 | 4.99 | Norfolk Island |
| 2020s | 57.34 | 58.77 | 1.43 | Norfolk Island |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protected terrestrial biodiversity sites, Australia or Norfolk Island?
- Norfolk Island, at 58.77 against 57.73 in Australia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in protected terrestrial biodiversity sites between Australia and Norfolk Island?
- 1.04, with Norfolk Island ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Norfolk Island?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Australia and Norfolk Island rank globally for protected terrestrial biodiversity sites?
- Australia ranks 83rd and Norfolk Island ranks 80th of 240 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Protected terrestrial biodiversity sites. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.