Botswana vs North Macedonia: Share of terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas that are protected
Botswana
51.1%
in 2024
North Macedonia
50.1%
in 2024
Botswana rank
103rd
North Macedonia rank
105th
Share of terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas that are protected over time
- Botswana
- North Macedonia
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 51.1% against 50.1% in North Macedonia, a difference of 1.0%.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Botswana has been ahead every year.
Botswana ranks 103rd and North Macedonia ranks 105th of 238 countries.
Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 51.1% | 41.5% | 9.6% | Botswana |
| 2010s | 51.1% | 45.2% | 5.9% | Botswana |
| 2020s | 51.1% | 50.0% | 1.1% | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of terrestrial key biodiversity areas that are protected, Botswana or North Macedonia?
- Botswana, at 51.1% against 50.1% in North Macedonia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in share of terrestrial key biodiversity areas that are protected between Botswana and North Macedonia?
- 1.0%, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and North Macedonia?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Botswana and North Macedonia rank globally for share of terrestrial key biodiversity areas that are protected?
- Botswana ranks 103rd and North Macedonia ranks 105th of 238 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- BirdLife International, IUCN and UNEP-WCMC – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas that are protected. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%)