Comoros vs Pitcairn: Protected terrestrial biodiversity sites
Comoros
57.4
in 2025
Pitcairn
57.17
in 2025
Comoros rank
87th
Pitcairn rank
89th
Protected terrestrial biodiversity sites over time
- Comoros
- Pitcairn
How they compare
Comoros currently reports 57.4 against 57.17 in Pitcairn, a difference of 0.23.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Pitcairn ahead.
Comoros ranks 87th and Pitcairn ranks 89th of 240 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Comoros averaged higher in 2 and Pitcairn in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Pitcairn | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 | 16.33 | 16.33 | Pitcairn |
| 2010s | 57.4 | 32.67 | 24.73 | Comoros |
| 2020s | 57.4 | 57.17 | 0.23 | Comoros |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protected terrestrial biodiversity sites, Comoros or Pitcairn?
- Comoros, at 57.4 against 57.17 in Pitcairn as of 2025.
- What is the difference in protected terrestrial biodiversity sites between Comoros and Pitcairn?
- 0.23, with Comoros ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Pitcairn?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Comoros and Pitcairn rank globally for protected terrestrial biodiversity sites?
- Comoros ranks 87th and Pitcairn ranks 89th of 240 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Protected terrestrial biodiversity sites. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.