Congo vs Pitcairn: Protected terrestrial biodiversity sites
Congo
57.43
in 2025
Pitcairn
57.17
in 2025
Congo rank
86th
Pitcairn rank
89th
Protected terrestrial biodiversity sites over time
- Congo
- Pitcairn
How they compare
Congo currently reports 57.43 against 57.17 in Pitcairn, a difference of 0.26.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Pitcairn ahead.
Congo ranks 86th and Pitcairn ranks 89th of 240 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 2 and Pitcairn in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Pitcairn | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 27.66 | 16.33 | 11.33 | Congo |
| 2010s | 43.89 | 32.67 | 11.22 | Congo |
| 2020s | 53.39 | 57.17 | 3.78 | Pitcairn |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protected terrestrial biodiversity sites, Congo or Pitcairn?
- Congo, at 57.43 against 57.17 in Pitcairn as of 2025.
- What is the difference in protected terrestrial biodiversity sites between Congo and Pitcairn?
- 0.26, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Pitcairn?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Congo and Pitcairn rank globally for protected terrestrial biodiversity sites?
- Congo ranks 86th and Pitcairn ranks 89th of 240 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Protected terrestrial biodiversity sites. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.