Croatia vs Namibia: Protected terrestrial biodiversity sites
Croatia
82.01
in 2025
Namibia
82.01
in 2025
Croatia rank
31st
Namibia rank
31st
Protected terrestrial biodiversity sites over time
- Croatia
- Namibia
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 82.01 against 82.01 in Namibia, a difference of 0.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.
Croatia ranks 31st and Namibia ranks 31st of 240 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 22.96 | 43.1 | 20.15 | Namibia |
| 2010s | 64.41 | 81.51 | 17.11 | Namibia |
| 2020s | 81.7 | 82 | 0.3017 | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protected terrestrial biodiversity sites, Croatia or Namibia?
- Croatia, at 82.01 against 82.01 in Namibia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in protected terrestrial biodiversity sites between Croatia and Namibia?
- 0, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Namibia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Croatia and Namibia rank globally for protected terrestrial biodiversity sites?
- Croatia ranks 31st and Namibia ranks 31st of 240 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Protected terrestrial biodiversity sites. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.