Egypt vs Kiribati: Share of terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas that are protected
Egypt
38.8%
in 2025
Kiribati
40.0%
in 2025
Egypt rank
146th
Kiribati rank
143rd
Share of terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas that are protected over time
- Egypt
- Kiribati
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 40.0% against 38.8% in Egypt, a difference of 1.2%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Egypt ahead.
Egypt ranks 146th and Kiribati ranks 143rd of 240 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 1 and Kiribati in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 35.4% | 16.0% | 19.4% | Egypt |
| 2010s | 38.8% | 40.0% | 1.2% | Kiribati |
| 2020s | 38.8% | 40.0% | 1.2% | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of terrestrial key biodiversity areas that are protected, Egypt or Kiribati?
- Kiribati, at 40.0% against 38.8% in Egypt as of 2025.
- What is the difference in share of terrestrial key biodiversity areas that are protected between Egypt and Kiribati?
- 1.2%, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Kiribati?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Egypt and Kiribati rank globally for share of terrestrial key biodiversity areas that are protected?
- Egypt ranks 146th and Kiribati ranks 143rd of 240 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- BirdLife International, IUCN and UNEP-WCMC – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas that are protected. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%).