Finland vs Malawi: Protected terrestrial biodiversity sites
Finland
71.72
in 2025
Malawi
71.37
in 2025
Finland rank
51st
Malawi rank
52nd
Protected terrestrial biodiversity sites over time
- Finland
- Malawi
How they compare
Finland currently reports 71.72 against 71.37 in Malawi, a difference of 0.35.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Malawi ahead.
Finland ranks 51st and Malawi ranks 52nd of 240 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 2 and Malawi in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 64.82 | 68.24 | 3.42 | Malawi |
| 2010s | 70.19 | 69.18 | 1.01 | Finland |
| 2020s | 71.68 | 71.37 | 0.31 | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protected terrestrial biodiversity sites, Finland or Malawi?
- Finland, at 71.72 against 71.37 in Malawi as of 2025.
- What is the difference in protected terrestrial biodiversity sites between Finland and Malawi?
- 0.35, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Malawi?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Finland and Malawi rank globally for protected terrestrial biodiversity sites?
- Finland ranks 51st and Malawi ranks 52nd of 240 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Protected terrestrial biodiversity sites. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.