Ghana vs Moldova: Share of terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas that are protected

Ghana
78.8%
in 2024
Moldova
78.4%
in 2024
Ghana rank
34th
Moldova rank
37th

Share of terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas that are protected over time

  • Ghana
  • Moldova
020406080200020122024

How they compare

Ghana currently reports 78.8% against 78.4% in Moldova, a difference of 0.4%.

Across all 25 years both countries report, Ghana has been ahead every year.

Ghana ranks 34th and Moldova ranks 37th of 238 countries.

Ghana has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ghana Moldova Difference Ahead
2000s 78.2% 52.3% 25.9% Ghana
2010s 78.8% 70.3% 8.5% Ghana
2020s 78.8% 78.4% 0.4% Ghana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher share of terrestrial key biodiversity areas that are protected, Ghana or Moldova?
Ghana, at 78.8% against 78.4% in Moldova as of 2024.
What is the difference in share of terrestrial key biodiversity areas that are protected between Ghana and Moldova?
0.4%, with Ghana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Moldova?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Ghana and Moldova rank globally for share of terrestrial key biodiversity areas that are protected?
Ghana ranks 34th and Moldova ranks 37th of 238 countries.
Where does this data come from?
BirdLife International, IUCN and UNEP-WCMC – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas that are protected. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Share of terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas that are protected
Unit
%
Source
BirdLife International, IUCN and UNEP-WCMC – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
238 places, 5,950 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%)