Heard Island and McDonald Islands vs Niue: Share of terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas that are protected

Heard Island and McDonald Islands
100.0%
in 2025
Niue
95.3%
in 2025
Heard Island and McDonald Islands rank
1st
Niue rank
11th

Share of terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas that are protected over time

  • Heard Island and McDonald Islands
  • Niue
020406080100200020122025

How they compare

Heard Island and McDonald Islands currently reports 100.0% against 95.3% in Niue, a difference of 4.7%.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Heard Island and McDonald Islands has been ahead every year.

Heard Island and McDonald Islands ranks 1st and Niue ranks 11th of 240 countries.

Heard Island and McDonald Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Heard Island and McDonald Islands Niue Difference Ahead
2000s 100.0% 95.3% 4.7% Heard Island and McDonald Islands
2010s 100.0% 95.3% 4.7% Heard Island and McDonald Islands
2020s 100.0% 95.3% 4.7% Heard Island and McDonald Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher share of terrestrial key biodiversity areas that are protected, Heard Island and McDonald Islands or Niue?
Heard Island and McDonald Islands, at 100.0% against 95.3% in Niue as of 2025.
What is the difference in share of terrestrial key biodiversity areas that are protected between Heard Island and McDonald Islands and Niue?
4.7%, with Heard Island and McDonald Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Heard Island and McDonald Islands and Niue?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Heard Island and McDonald Islands and Niue rank globally for share of terrestrial key biodiversity areas that are protected?
Heard Island and McDonald Islands ranks 1st and Niue ranks 11th of 240 countries.
Where does this data come from?
BirdLife International, IUCN and UNEP-WCMC – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas that are protected. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Heard Island and McDonald Islands vs Niue: Share of terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas that are protected. Statizoid, drawing on BirdLife International, IUCN and UNEP-WCMC – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/protected-terrestrial-biodiversity-sites/heard-island-and-mcdonald-islands/niue/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/protected-terrestrial-biodiversity-sites/heard-island-and-mcdonald-islands/niue/">Heard Island and McDonald Islands vs Niue: Share of terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas that are protected</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Share of terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas that are protected
Unit
%
Source
BirdLife International, IUCN and UNEP-WCMC – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
240 places, 6,240 data points, 2000–2025
Last refreshed

Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%).