Hong Kong, China vs North Macedonia: Protected terrestrial biodiversity sites
Hong Kong, China
48.93
in 2024
North Macedonia
50.06
in 2024
Hong Kong, China rank
105th
North Macedonia rank
103rd
Protected terrestrial biodiversity sites over time
- Hong Kong, China
- North Macedonia
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 50.06 against 48.93 in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 1.13.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.
Hong Kong, China ranks 105th and North Macedonia ranks 103rd of 231 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Hong Kong, China averaged higher in 2 and North Macedonia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong, China | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 48.93 | 41.49 | 7.44 | Hong Kong, China |
| 2010s | 48.93 | 45.18 | 3.75 | Hong Kong, China |
| 2020s | 48.93 | 50 | 1.07 | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protected terrestrial biodiversity sites, Hong Kong, China or North Macedonia?
- North Macedonia, at 50.06 against 48.93 in Hong Kong, China as of 2024.
- What is the difference in protected terrestrial biodiversity sites between Hong Kong, China and North Macedonia?
- 1.13, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and North Macedonia?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Hong Kong, China and North Macedonia rank globally for protected terrestrial biodiversity sites?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 105th and North Macedonia ranks 103rd of 231 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Protected terrestrial biodiversity sites. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.