Hungary vs Zimbabwe: Share of terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas that are protected
Hungary
84.3%
in 2024
Zimbabwe
85.1%
in 2024
Hungary rank
23rd
Zimbabwe rank
22nd
Share of terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas that are protected over time
- Hungary
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 85.1% against 84.3% in Hungary, a difference of 0.8%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Hungary ranks 23rd and Zimbabwe ranks 22nd of 238 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Hungary averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 68.0% | 77.5% | 9.6% | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 84.3% | 83.6% | 0.7% | Hungary |
| 2020s | 84.3% | 85.1% | 0.9% | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of terrestrial key biodiversity areas that are protected, Hungary or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 85.1% against 84.3% in Hungary as of 2024.
- What is the difference in share of terrestrial key biodiversity areas that are protected between Hungary and Zimbabwe?
- 0.8%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Zimbabwe?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Hungary and Zimbabwe rank globally for share of terrestrial key biodiversity areas that are protected?
- Hungary ranks 23rd and Zimbabwe ranks 22nd of 238 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- BirdLife International, IUCN and UNEP-WCMC – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas that are protected. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%)