Malawi vs Slovenia: Protected terrestrial biodiversity sites
Malawi
71.37
in 2025
Slovenia
73.72
in 2025
Malawi rank
52nd
Slovenia rank
50th
Protected terrestrial biodiversity sites over time
- Malawi
- Slovenia
How they compare
Slovenia currently reports 73.72 against 71.37 in Malawi, a difference of 2.35.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Malawi ahead.
Malawi ranks 52nd and Slovenia ranks 50th of 240 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 1 and Slovenia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 68.24 | 49.16 | 19.08 | Malawi |
| 2010s | 69.18 | 72.64 | 3.46 | Slovenia |
| 2020s | 71.37 | 73.72 | 2.35 | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protected terrestrial biodiversity sites, Malawi or Slovenia?
- Slovenia, at 73.72 against 71.37 in Malawi as of 2025.
- What is the difference in protected terrestrial biodiversity sites between Malawi and Slovenia?
- 2.35, with Slovenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Slovenia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Malawi and Slovenia rank globally for protected terrestrial biodiversity sites?
- Malawi ranks 52nd and Slovenia ranks 50th of 240 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Protected terrestrial biodiversity sites. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.