Malaysia vs Rwanda: Protected terrestrial biodiversity sites
Malaysia
37.03
in 2025
Rwanda
37.08
in 2025
Malaysia rank
151st
Rwanda rank
150th
Protected terrestrial biodiversity sites over time
- Malaysia
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 37.08 against 37.03 in Malaysia, a difference of 0.05.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Rwanda ahead.
Malaysia ranks 151st and Rwanda ranks 150th of 240 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Malaysia averaged higher in 2 and Rwanda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 24.88 | 30.4 | 5.52 | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 35.19 | 34.02 | 1.16 | Malaysia |
| 2020s | 37.03 | 36.28 | 0.75 | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protected terrestrial biodiversity sites, Malaysia or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 37.08 against 37.03 in Malaysia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in protected terrestrial biodiversity sites between Malaysia and Rwanda?
- 0.05, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Rwanda?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Malaysia and Rwanda rank globally for protected terrestrial biodiversity sites?
- Malaysia ranks 151st and Rwanda ranks 150th of 240 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Protected terrestrial biodiversity sites. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.