New Caledonia vs Serbia: Protected terrestrial biodiversity sites
New Caledonia
43.58
in 2024
Serbia
42.89
in 2024
New Caledonia rank
126th
Serbia rank
129th
Protected terrestrial biodiversity sites over time
- New Caledonia
- Serbia
How they compare
New Caledonia currently reports 43.58 against 42.89 in Serbia, a difference of 0.69.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Serbia ahead.
New Caledonia ranks 126th and Serbia ranks 129th of 238 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, New Caledonia averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Caledonia | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8.63 | 19.49 | 10.87 | Serbia |
| 2010s | 35.36 | 26.46 | 8.9 | New Caledonia |
| 2020s | 43.58 | 38.03 | 5.55 | New Caledonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protected terrestrial biodiversity sites, New Caledonia or Serbia?
- New Caledonia, at 43.58 against 42.89 in Serbia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in protected terrestrial biodiversity sites between New Caledonia and Serbia?
- 0.69, with New Caledonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Serbia?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do New Caledonia and Serbia rank globally for protected terrestrial biodiversity sites?
- New Caledonia ranks 126th and Serbia ranks 129th of 238 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Protected terrestrial biodiversity sites. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.