New Caledonia vs Sri Lanka: Protected terrestrial biodiversity sites

New Caledonia
43.58
in 2024
Sri Lanka
43.69
in 2024
New Caledonia rank
126th
Sri Lanka rank
125th

Protected terrestrial biodiversity sites over time

  • New Caledonia
  • Sri Lanka
10203040200020122024

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 43.69 against 43.58 in New Caledonia, a difference of 0.11.

Across all 25 years both countries report, Sri Lanka has been ahead every year.

New Caledonia ranks 126th and Sri Lanka ranks 125th of 238 countries.

Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Caledonia Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
2000s 8.63 37.46 28.83 Sri Lanka
2010s 35.36 43.04 7.68 Sri Lanka
2020s 43.58 43.69 0.11 Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher protected terrestrial biodiversity sites, New Caledonia or Sri Lanka?
Sri Lanka, at 43.69 against 43.58 in New Caledonia as of 2024.
What is the difference in protected terrestrial biodiversity sites between New Caledonia and Sri Lanka?
0.11, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Sri Lanka?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do New Caledonia and Sri Lanka rank globally for protected terrestrial biodiversity sites?
New Caledonia ranks 126th and Sri Lanka ranks 125th of 238 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Our World in Data, published as Protected terrestrial biodiversity sites. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Protected terrestrial biodiversity sites
Source
Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
238 places, 5,950 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed