New Zealand vs Samoa: Protected terrestrial biodiversity sites

New Zealand
46.22
in 2024
Samoa
47.05
in 2024
New Zealand rank
114th
Samoa rank
111th

Protected terrestrial biodiversity sites over time

  • New Zealand
  • Samoa
01020304050200020122024

How they compare

Samoa currently reports 47.05 against 46.22 in New Zealand, a difference of 0.83.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was New Zealand ahead.

New Zealand ranks 114th and Samoa ranks 111th of 238 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, New Zealand averaged higher in 1 and Samoa in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Zealand Samoa Difference Ahead
2000s 43.76 42.31 1.45 New Zealand
2010s 45.89 47.02 1.14 Samoa
2020s 46.22 47.05 0.83 Samoa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher protected terrestrial biodiversity sites, New Zealand or Samoa?
Samoa, at 47.05 against 46.22 in New Zealand as of 2024.
What is the difference in protected terrestrial biodiversity sites between New Zealand and Samoa?
0.83, with Samoa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Samoa?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do New Zealand and Samoa rank globally for protected terrestrial biodiversity sites?
New Zealand ranks 114th and Samoa ranks 111th of 238 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Our World in Data, published as Protected terrestrial biodiversity sites. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Protected terrestrial biodiversity sites
Source
Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
238 places, 5,950 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed