New Zealand vs Zambia: Protected terrestrial biodiversity sites
New Zealand
46.22
in 2024
Zambia
46.14
in 2024
New Zealand rank
112th
Zambia rank
113th
Protected terrestrial biodiversity sites over time
- New Zealand
- Zambia
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 46.22 against 46.14 in Zambia, a difference of 0.08.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Zambia ahead.
New Zealand ranks 112th and Zambia ranks 113th of 231 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, New Zealand averaged higher in 1 and Zambia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 43.76 | 46.14 | 2.38 | Zambia |
| 2010s | 45.89 | 46.14 | 0.251 | Zambia |
| 2020s | 46.22 | 46.14 | 0.08 | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protected terrestrial biodiversity sites, New Zealand or Zambia?
- New Zealand, at 46.22 against 46.14 in Zambia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in protected terrestrial biodiversity sites between New Zealand and Zambia?
- 0.08, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Zambia?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do New Zealand and Zambia rank globally for protected terrestrial biodiversity sites?
- New Zealand ranks 112th and Zambia ranks 113th of 231 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Protected terrestrial biodiversity sites. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.