Niger vs Pitcairn: Protected terrestrial biodiversity sites
Niger
56.64
in 2025
Pitcairn
57.17
in 2025
Niger rank
92nd
Pitcairn rank
89th
Protected terrestrial biodiversity sites over time
- Niger
- Pitcairn
How they compare
Pitcairn currently reports 57.17 against 56.64 in Niger, a difference of 0.53.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Pitcairn ahead.
Niger ranks 92nd and Pitcairn ranks 89th of 240 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Niger averaged higher in 2 and Pitcairn in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Niger | Pitcairn | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 29.42 | 16.33 | 13.09 | Niger |
| 2010s | 41.46 | 32.67 | 8.79 | Niger |
| 2020s | 56.64 | 57.17 | 0.53 | Pitcairn |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protected terrestrial biodiversity sites, Niger or Pitcairn?
- Pitcairn, at 57.17 against 56.64 in Niger as of 2025.
- What is the difference in protected terrestrial biodiversity sites between Niger and Pitcairn?
- 0.53, with Pitcairn ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Niger and Pitcairn?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Niger and Pitcairn rank globally for protected terrestrial biodiversity sites?
- Niger ranks 92nd and Pitcairn ranks 89th of 240 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Protected terrestrial biodiversity sites. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.