North Macedonia vs Suriname: Protected terrestrial biodiversity sites
North Macedonia
50.69
in 2025
Suriname
51.19
in 2025
North Macedonia rank
106th
Suriname rank
105th
Protected terrestrial biodiversity sites over time
- North Macedonia
- Suriname
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 51.19 against 50.69 in North Macedonia, a difference of 0.5.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.
North Macedonia ranks 106th and Suriname ranks 105th of 240 countries.
Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Macedonia | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 44.29 | 51.19 | 6.9 | Suriname |
| 2010s | 47.84 | 51.19 | 3.35 | Suriname |
| 2020s | 50.61 | 51.19 | 0.5783 | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protected terrestrial biodiversity sites, North Macedonia or Suriname?
- Suriname, at 51.19 against 50.69 in North Macedonia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in protected terrestrial biodiversity sites between North Macedonia and Suriname?
- 0.5, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Suriname?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do North Macedonia and Suriname rank globally for protected terrestrial biodiversity sites?
- North Macedonia ranks 106th and Suriname ranks 105th of 240 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Protected terrestrial biodiversity sites. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.