Norway vs Pitcairn: Protected terrestrial biodiversity sites
Norway
56.86
in 2025
Pitcairn
57.17
in 2025
Norway rank
90th
Pitcairn rank
89th
Protected terrestrial biodiversity sites over time
- Norway
- Pitcairn
How they compare
Pitcairn currently reports 57.17 against 56.86 in Norway, a difference of 0.31.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Norway ahead.
Norway ranks 90th and Pitcairn ranks 89th of 240 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Norway averaged higher in 2 and Pitcairn in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Norway | Pitcairn | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 47.84 | 16.33 | 31.51 | Norway |
| 2010s | 54.12 | 32.67 | 21.45 | Norway |
| 2020s | 56.86 | 57.17 | 0.31 | Pitcairn |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protected terrestrial biodiversity sites, Norway or Pitcairn?
- Pitcairn, at 57.17 against 56.86 in Norway as of 2025.
- What is the difference in protected terrestrial biodiversity sites between Norway and Pitcairn?
- 0.31, with Pitcairn ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Pitcairn?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Norway and Pitcairn rank globally for protected terrestrial biodiversity sites?
- Norway ranks 90th and Pitcairn ranks 89th of 240 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Protected terrestrial biodiversity sites. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.