Ecuador vs Eswatini: Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape, Capital (central government)
Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape, Capital (central government) over time
- Ecuador
- Eswatini
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 0.16 million USD against 0 million USD in Ecuador, a difference of 0.16 million USD.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 53rd and Eswatini ranks 50th of 63 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Eswatini in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.7367 million USD | 0.4633 million USD | 0.2733 million USD | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 0.05 million USD | 0.0933 million USD | 0.0433 million USD | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protection of biodiversity and landscape, capital (central government), Ecuador or Eswatini?
- Eswatini, at 0.16 million USD against 0 million USD in Ecuador as of 2024.
- What is the difference in protection of biodiversity and landscape, capital (central government) between Ecuador and Eswatini?
- 0.16 million USD, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Eswatini?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and Eswatini rank globally for protection of biodiversity and landscape, capital (central government)?
- Ecuador ranks 53rd and Eswatini ranks 50th of 63 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape, Capital (central government expenditure) — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.