Chile vs United Republic of Tanzania: Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape, Capital (central government)
Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape, Capital (central government) over time
- Chile
- United Republic of Tanzania
How they compare
Chile currently reports 6,735 million SLC against 0 million SLC in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 6,735 million SLC.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 5th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 2nd of 63 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and United Republic of Tanzania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | United Republic of Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,431 million SLC | 2,318 million SLC | 886.87 million SLC | United Republic of Tanzania |
| 2010s | 3,832 million SLC | 2,529 million SLC | 1,303 million SLC | Chile |
| 2020s | 5,767 million SLC | 0 million SLC | 5,767 million SLC | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protection of biodiversity and landscape, capital (central government), Chile or United Republic of Tanzania?
- Chile, at 6,735 million SLC against 0 million SLC in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in protection of biodiversity and landscape, capital (central government) between Chile and United Republic of Tanzania?
- 6,735 million SLC, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and United Republic of Tanzania?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
- How do Chile and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for protection of biodiversity and landscape, capital (central government)?
- Chile ranks 5th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 2nd of 63 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape, Capital (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.