Lithuania vs Netherlands (Kingdom of the): Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape, Capital (general government)
Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape, Capital (general government) over time
- Lithuania
- Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 30.23 million USD against 21.63 million USD in Netherlands (Kingdom of the), a difference of 8.6 million USD.
That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.4 times Netherlands (Kingdom of the)'s.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ahead.
Lithuania ranks 13th and Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ranks 16th of 43 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 1 and Netherlands (Kingdom of the) in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Netherlands (Kingdom of the) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 10.28 million USD | 33.15 million USD | 22.87 million USD | Netherlands (Kingdom of the) |
| 2020s | 20.18 million USD | -32.6 million USD | 52.78 million USD | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protection of biodiversity and landscape, capital (general government), Lithuania or Netherlands (Kingdom of the)?
- Lithuania, at 30.23 million USD against 21.63 million USD in Netherlands (Kingdom of the) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in protection of biodiversity and landscape, capital (general government) between Lithuania and Netherlands (Kingdom of the)?
- 8.6 million USD, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Netherlands (Kingdom of the)?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
- How do Lithuania and Netherlands (Kingdom of the) rank globally for protection of biodiversity and landscape, capital (general government)?
- Lithuania ranks 13th and Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ranks 16th of 43 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape, Capital (general government expenditure) — Value US$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.