Armenia vs Brazil: Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape, Capital (general government)
Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape, Capital (general government) over time
- Armenia
- Brazil
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 2,229 million SLC against 1,128 million SLC in Armenia, a difference of 1,101 million SLC.
That makes Brazil's figure about 2.0 times Armenia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 7th and Brazil ranks 6th of 43 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 1 and Brazil in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Brazil | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2,297 million SLC | 827.6 million SLC | 1,469 million SLC | Armenia |
| 2020s | 441.7 million SLC | 1,007 million SLC | 565.46 million SLC | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protection of biodiversity and landscape, capital (general government), Armenia or Brazil?
- Brazil, at 2,229 million SLC against 1,128 million SLC in Armenia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in protection of biodiversity and landscape, capital (general government) between Armenia and Brazil?
- 1,101 million SLC, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Brazil?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
- How do Armenia and Brazil rank globally for protection of biodiversity and landscape, capital (general government)?
- Armenia ranks 7th and Brazil ranks 6th of 43 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape, Capital (general government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.