France vs South Africa: Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape, Capital (general government)
Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape, Capital (general government) over time
- France
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 773 million SLC against 604 million SLC in France, a difference of 169 million SLC.
That makes South Africa's figure about 1.3 times France's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.
France ranks 10th and South Africa ranks 9th of 43 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | France | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 679 million SLC | 1,062 million SLC | 383 million SLC | South Africa |
| 2020s | 582.5 million SLC | 727.75 million SLC | 145.25 million SLC | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protection of biodiversity and landscape, capital (general government), France or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 773 million SLC against 604 million SLC in France as of 2023.
- What is the difference in protection of biodiversity and landscape, capital (general government) between France and South Africa?
- 169 million SLC, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for France and South Africa?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
- How do France and South Africa rank globally for protection of biodiversity and landscape, capital (general government)?
- France ranks 10th and South Africa ranks 9th of 43 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape, Capital (general government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.