Italy vs Poland: Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape, Capital (general government)
Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape, Capital (general government) over time
- Italy
- Poland
How they compare
Italy currently reports 1,070 million SLC against 514.9 million SLC in Poland, a difference of 555.1 million SLC.
That makes Italy's figure about 2.1 times Poland's.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Italy has been ahead every year.
Italy ranks 8th and Poland ranks 11th of 43 countries.
Italy has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Italy | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 771.29 million SLC | 26.78 million SLC | 744.5 million SLC | Italy |
| 2020s | 853.5 million SLC | 392.23 million SLC | 461.27 million SLC | Italy |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protection of biodiversity and landscape, capital (general government), Italy or Poland?
- Italy, at 1,070 million SLC against 514.9 million SLC in Poland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in protection of biodiversity and landscape, capital (general government) between Italy and Poland?
- 555.1 million SLC, with Italy ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and Poland?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2023.
- How do Italy and Poland rank globally for protection of biodiversity and landscape, capital (general government)?
- Italy ranks 8th and Poland ranks 11th of 43 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape, Capital (general government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.