Argentina vs Colombia: Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (central government)
Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (central government) over time
- Argentina
- Colombia
How they compare
Colombia currently reports 817,986 million SLC against 108,079 million SLC in Argentina, a difference of 709,907 million SLC.
That makes Colombia's figure about 7.6 times Argentina's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Colombia has been ahead every year.
Argentina ranks 5th and Colombia ranks 2nd of 118 countries.
Colombia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Colombia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 4,039 million SLC | 409,540 million SLC | 405,500 million SLC | Colombia |
| 2020s | 17,349 million SLC | 525,174 million SLC | 507,824 million SLC | Colombia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protection of biodiversity and landscape (central government), Argentina or Colombia?
- Colombia, at 817,986 million SLC against 108,079 million SLC in Argentina as of 2023.
- What is the difference in protection of biodiversity and landscape (central government) between Argentina and Colombia?
- 709,907 million SLC, with Colombia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Colombia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
- How do Argentina and Colombia rank globally for protection of biodiversity and landscape (central government)?
- Argentina ranks 5th and Colombia ranks 2nd of 118 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.