Bangladesh vs Luxembourg: Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (central government)

Bangladesh
50 million SLC
in 2009
Luxembourg
81.42 million SLC
in 2024
Bangladesh rank
70th
Luxembourg rank
67th

Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (central government) over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Luxembourg
050100150200120122024

How they compare

Luxembourg currently reports 81.42 million SLC against 50 million SLC in Bangladesh, a difference of 31.42 million SLC.

That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.6 times Bangladesh's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Bangladesh ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 70th and Luxembourg ranks 67th of 118 countries.

Bangladesh has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher protection of biodiversity and landscape (central government), Bangladesh or Luxembourg?
Luxembourg, at 81.42 million SLC against 50 million SLC in Bangladesh as of 2024.
What is the difference in protection of biodiversity and landscape (central government) between Bangladesh and Luxembourg?
31.42 million SLC, with Luxembourg ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Luxembourg?
7 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2009.
How do Bangladesh and Luxembourg rank globally for protection of biodiversity and landscape (central government)?
Bangladesh ranks 70th and Luxembourg ranks 67th of 118 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Luxembourg: Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (central government). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/protection-of-biodiversity-and-landscape-central-government-expenditure-value-standard/bangladesh/luxembourg/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/protection-of-biodiversity-and-landscape-central-government-expenditure-value-standard/bangladesh/luxembourg/">Bangladesh vs Luxembourg: Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (central government)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency
Unit
million SLC
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
127 places, 1,948 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed

The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.