Cabo Verde vs Democratic Republic of the Congo: Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (central government)
Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (central government) over time
- Cabo Verde
- Democratic Republic of the Congo
How they compare
Democratic Republic of the Congo currently reports 4,070 million SLC against 9.21 million SLC in Cabo Verde, a difference of 4,061 million SLC.
That makes Democratic Republic of the Congo's figure about 441.9 times Cabo Verde's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Democratic Republic of the Congo has been ahead every year.
Cabo Verde ranks 2nd and Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 2nd of 3 countries.
Democratic Republic of the Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cabo Verde | Democratic Republic of the Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2.62 million SLC | 7,412 million SLC | 7,409 million SLC | Democratic Republic of the Congo |
| 2020s | 25.46 million SLC | 38,584 million SLC | 38,558 million SLC | Democratic Republic of the Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protection of biodiversity and landscape (central government), Cabo Verde or Democratic Republic of the Congo?
- Democratic Republic of the Congo, at 4,070 million SLC against 9.21 million SLC in Cabo Verde as of 2024.
- What is the difference in protection of biodiversity and landscape (central government) between Cabo Verde and Democratic Republic of the Congo?
- 4,061 million SLC, with Democratic Republic of the Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and Democratic Republic of the Congo?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Cabo Verde and Democratic Republic of the Congo rank globally for protection of biodiversity and landscape (central government)?
- Cabo Verde ranks 2nd and Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 2nd of 3 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.