Cabo Verde vs Republic of Moldova: Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (central government)
Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (central government) over time
- Cabo Verde
- Republic of Moldova
How they compare
Republic of Moldova currently reports 10 million SLC against 9.21 million SLC in Cabo Verde, a difference of 0.79 million SLC.
That makes Republic of Moldova's figure about 1.1 times Cabo Verde's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Cabo Verde ahead.
Cabo Verde ranks 2nd and Republic of Moldova ranks 4th of 3 countries.
Cabo Verde has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cabo Verde | Republic of Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2.99 million SLC | 0.7857 million SLC | 2.21 million SLC | Cabo Verde |
| 2020s | 25.46 million SLC | 1.48 million SLC | 23.99 million SLC | Cabo Verde |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protection of biodiversity and landscape (central government), Cabo Verde or Republic of Moldova?
- Republic of Moldova, at 10 million SLC against 9.21 million SLC in Cabo Verde as of 2024.
- What is the difference in protection of biodiversity and landscape (central government) between Cabo Verde and Republic of Moldova?
- 0.79 million SLC, with Republic of Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and Republic of Moldova?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2023.
- How do Cabo Verde and Republic of Moldova rank globally for protection of biodiversity and landscape (central government)?
- Cabo Verde ranks 2nd and Republic of Moldova ranks 4th of 3 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.