Chile vs Türkiye: Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (central government)
Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (central government) over time
- Chile
- Türkiye
How they compare
Chile currently reports 231,522 million SLC against 3,601 million SLC in Türkiye, a difference of 227,921 million SLC.
That makes Chile's figure about 64.3 times Türkiye's.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 3rd and Türkiye ranks 3rd of 118 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Türkiye | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 38,180 million SLC | 74.79 million SLC | 38,105 million SLC | Chile |
| 2010s | 95,237 million SLC | 131.41 million SLC | 95,105 million SLC | Chile |
| 2020s | 175,788 million SLC | 1,620 million SLC | 174,168 million SLC | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protection of biodiversity and landscape (central government), Chile or Türkiye?
- Chile, at 231,522 million SLC against 3,601 million SLC in Türkiye as of 2024.
- What is the difference in protection of biodiversity and landscape (central government) between Chile and Türkiye?
- 227,921 million SLC, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Türkiye?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Chile and Türkiye rank globally for protection of biodiversity and landscape (central government)?
- Chile ranks 3rd and Türkiye ranks 3rd of 118 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.