Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Türkiye: Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (central government)
Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (central government) over time
- Democratic Republic of the Congo
- Türkiye
How they compare
Democratic Republic of the Congo currently reports 4,070 million SLC against 3,601 million SLC in Türkiye, a difference of 469 million SLC.
That makes Democratic Republic of the Congo's figure about 1.1 times Türkiye's.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Democratic Republic of the Congo has been ahead every year.
Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 2nd and Türkiye ranks 3rd of 6 countries.
Democratic Republic of the Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Democratic Republic of the Congo | Türkiye | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 7,811 million SLC | 131.41 million SLC | 7,679 million SLC | Democratic Republic of the Congo |
| 2020s | 31,681 million SLC | 1,620 million SLC | 30,061 million SLC | Democratic Republic of the Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protection of biodiversity and landscape (central government), Democratic Republic of the Congo or Türkiye?
- Democratic Republic of the Congo, at 4,070 million SLC against 3,601 million SLC in Türkiye as of 2024.
- What is the difference in protection of biodiversity and landscape (central government) between Democratic Republic of the Congo and Türkiye?
- 469 million SLC, with Democratic Republic of the Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of the Congo and Türkiye?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2024.
- How do Democratic Republic of the Congo and Türkiye rank globally for protection of biodiversity and landscape (central government)?
- Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 2nd and Türkiye ranks 3rd of 6 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.