Grenada vs New Caledonia: Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (central government)

Grenada
3.64 million SLC
in 2024
New Caledonia
4 million SLC
in 2016
Grenada rank
89th
New Caledonia rank
87th

Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (central government) over time

  • Grenada
  • New Caledonia
050100150200250201120172024

How they compare

New Caledonia currently reports 4 million SLC against 3.64 million SLC in Grenada, a difference of 0.36 million SLC.

That makes New Caledonia's figure about 1.1 times Grenada's.

Across all 5 years both countries report, New Caledonia has been ahead every year.

Grenada ranks 89th and New Caledonia ranks 87th of 118 countries.

New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher protection of biodiversity and landscape (central government), Grenada or New Caledonia?
New Caledonia, at 4 million SLC against 3.64 million SLC in Grenada as of 2016.
What is the difference in protection of biodiversity and landscape (central government) between Grenada and New Caledonia?
0.36 million SLC, with New Caledonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and New Caledonia?
5 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2016.
How do Grenada and New Caledonia rank globally for protection of biodiversity and landscape (central government)?
Grenada ranks 89th and New Caledonia ranks 87th of 118 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Grenada vs New Caledonia: Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (central government). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/protection-of-biodiversity-and-landscape-central-government-expenditure-value-standard/grenada/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/protection-of-biodiversity-and-landscape-central-government-expenditure-value-standard/grenada/new-caledonia/">Grenada vs New Caledonia: Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (central government)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency
Unit
million SLC
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
127 places, 1,948 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed

The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.