Guatemala vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (central government)

Guatemala
832.31 million SLC
in 2024
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
793 million SLC
in 2023
Guatemala rank
36th
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank
39th

Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (central government) over time

  • Guatemala
  • United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
0200400600800200120122024

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 832.31 million SLC against 793 million SLC in United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, a difference of 39.31 million SLC.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2014 it was United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ahead.

Guatemala ranks 36th and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 39th of 118 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 1 and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Difference Ahead
2010s 467.74 million SLC 551 million SLC 83.26 million SLC United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
2020s 739.07 million SLC 574 million SLC 165.07 million SLC Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher protection of biodiversity and landscape (central government), Guatemala or United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
Guatemala, at 832.31 million SLC against 793 million SLC in United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland as of 2024.
What is the difference in protection of biodiversity and landscape (central government) between Guatemala and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
39.31 million SLC, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
10 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank globally for protection of biodiversity and landscape (central government)?
Guatemala ranks 36th and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 39th of 118 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (central government). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 19 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/protection-of-biodiversity-and-landscape-central-government-expenditure-value-standard/guatemala/united-kingdom-of-great-britain-and-northern-ireland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/protection-of-biodiversity-and-landscape-central-government-expenditure-value-standard/guatemala/united-kingdom-of-great-britain-and-northern-ireland/">Guatemala vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (central government)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency
Unit
million SLC
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
127 places, 1,948 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed

The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.