Iran (Islamic Republic of) vs Uganda: Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (central government)
Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (central government) over time
- Iran (Islamic Republic of)
- Uganda
How they compare
Iran (Islamic Republic of) currently reports 11.99 million million SLC against 120,166 million SLC in Uganda, a difference of 11.87 million million SLC.
That makes Iran (Islamic Republic of)'s figure about 99.8 times Uganda's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Iran (Islamic Republic of) has been ahead every year.
Iran (Islamic Republic of) ranks 1st and Uganda ranks 4th of 6 countries.
Iran (Islamic Republic of) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iran (Islamic Republic of) | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2.66 million million SLC | 784.92 million SLC | 2.66 million million SLC | Iran (Islamic Republic of) |
| 2020s | 9.03 million million SLC | 106,694 million SLC | 8.92 million million SLC | Iran (Islamic Republic of) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protection of biodiversity and landscape (central government), Iran (Islamic Republic of) or Uganda?
- Iran (Islamic Republic of), at 11.99 million million SLC against 120,166 million SLC in Uganda as of 2021.
- What is the difference in protection of biodiversity and landscape (central government) between Iran (Islamic Republic of) and Uganda?
- 11.87 million million SLC, with Iran (Islamic Republic of) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iran (Islamic Republic of) and Uganda?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2021.
- How do Iran (Islamic Republic of) and Uganda rank globally for protection of biodiversity and landscape (central government)?
- Iran (Islamic Republic of) ranks 1st and Uganda ranks 4th of 6 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.