Romania vs United Arab Emirates: Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (central government)
Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (central government) over time
- Romania
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
Romania currently reports 0 million SLC against 0 million SLC in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 0 million SLC.
Across all 5 years both countries report, United Arab Emirates has been ahead every year.
Romania ranks 103rd and United Arab Emirates ranks 103rd of 118 countries.
United Arab Emirates has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Romania | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 6.15 million SLC | 270.57 million SLC | 264.43 million SLC | United Arab Emirates |
| 2020s | 0 million SLC | 24.68 million SLC | 24.68 million SLC | United Arab Emirates |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protection of biodiversity and landscape (central government), Romania or United Arab Emirates?
- Romania, at 0 million SLC against 0 million SLC in United Arab Emirates as of 2023.
- What is the difference in protection of biodiversity and landscape (central government) between Romania and United Arab Emirates?
- 0 million SLC, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and United Arab Emirates?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2021.
- How do Romania and United Arab Emirates rank globally for protection of biodiversity and landscape (central government)?
- Romania ranks 103rd and United Arab Emirates ranks 103rd of 118 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.