Iran (Islamic Republic of) vs Netherlands (Kingdom of the): Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (central government)

Iran (Islamic Republic of)
86.24 million USD
in 2021
Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
530.94 million USD
in 2023
Iran (Islamic Republic of) rank
2nd
Netherlands (Kingdom of the) rank
5th

Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (central government) over time

  • Iran (Islamic Republic of)
  • Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
02004006008001.0k200120122023

How they compare

Netherlands (Kingdom of the) currently reports 530.94 million USD against 86.24 million USD in Iran (Islamic Republic of), a difference of 444.7 million USD.

That makes Netherlands (Kingdom of the)'s figure about 6.2 times Iran (Islamic Republic of)'s.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Netherlands (Kingdom of the) has been ahead every year.

Iran (Islamic Republic of) ranks 2nd and Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ranks 5th of 6 countries.

Netherlands (Kingdom of the) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iran (Islamic Republic of) Netherlands (Kingdom of the) Difference Ahead
2010s 65.99 million USD 512.15 million USD 446.16 million USD Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
2020s 77.21 million USD 547.52 million USD 470.31 million USD Netherlands (Kingdom of the)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher protection of biodiversity and landscape (central government), Iran (Islamic Republic of) or Netherlands (Kingdom of the)?
Netherlands (Kingdom of the), at 530.94 million USD against 86.24 million USD in Iran (Islamic Republic of) as of 2023.
What is the difference in protection of biodiversity and landscape (central government) between Iran (Islamic Republic of) and Netherlands (Kingdom of the)?
444.7 million USD, with Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iran (Islamic Republic of) and Netherlands (Kingdom of the)?
6 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2021.
How do Iran (Islamic Republic of) and Netherlands (Kingdom of the) rank globally for protection of biodiversity and landscape (central government)?
Iran (Islamic Republic of) ranks 2nd and Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ranks 5th of 6 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (central government expenditure) — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iran (Islamic Republic of) vs Netherlands (Kingdom of the): Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (central government). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/protection-of-biodiversity-and-landscape-central-government-expenditure-value-us-2015/iran-islamic-republic-of/netherlands-kingdom-of-the/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/protection-of-biodiversity-and-landscape-central-government-expenditure-value-us-2015/iran-islamic-republic-of/netherlands-kingdom-of-the/">Iran (Islamic Republic of) vs Netherlands (Kingdom of the): Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (central government)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (central government expenditure) — Value US$, 2015 prices
Unit
million USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
127 places, 1,948 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed

The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.