Netherlands (Kingdom of the) vs United Republic of Tanzania: Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (central government)

Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
530.94 million USD
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
0 million USD
in 2024
Netherlands (Kingdom of the) rank
5th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
5th

Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (central government) over time

  • Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
  • United Republic of Tanzania
02004006008001.0k200120122024

How they compare

Netherlands (Kingdom of the) currently reports 530.94 million USD against 0 million USD in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 530.94 million USD.

Across all 17 years both countries report, Netherlands (Kingdom of the) has been ahead every year.

Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ranks 5th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 5th of 118 countries.

Netherlands (Kingdom of the) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Netherlands (Kingdom of the) United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
2000s 668.93 million USD 8.69 million USD 660.24 million USD Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
2010s 554.41 million USD 9.14 million USD 545.27 million USD Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
2020s 517.7 million USD 0 million USD 517.7 million USD Netherlands (Kingdom of the)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher protection of biodiversity and landscape (central government), Netherlands (Kingdom of the) or United Republic of Tanzania?
Netherlands (Kingdom of the), at 530.94 million USD against 0 million USD in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in protection of biodiversity and landscape (central government) between Netherlands (Kingdom of the) and United Republic of Tanzania?
530.94 million USD, with Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Netherlands (Kingdom of the) and United Republic of Tanzania?
17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2023.
How do Netherlands (Kingdom of the) and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for protection of biodiversity and landscape (central government)?
Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ranks 5th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 5th of 118 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (central government expenditure) — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Netherlands (Kingdom of the) vs United Republic of Tanzania: Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (central government). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/protection-of-biodiversity-and-landscape-central-government-expenditure-value-us-2015/netherlands-kingdom-of-the/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/protection-of-biodiversity-and-landscape-central-government-expenditure-value-us-2015/netherlands-kingdom-of-the/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Netherlands (Kingdom of the) vs United Republic of Tanzania: Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (central government)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (central government expenditure) — Value US$, 2015 prices
Unit
million USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
127 places, 1,948 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed

The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.