Papua New Guinea vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (central government)

Papua New Guinea
0.62 million USD
in 2023
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
0.75 million USD
in 2024
Papua New Guinea rank
91st
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank
89th

Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (central government) over time

  • Papua New Guinea
  • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
051015201520192024

How they compare

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines currently reports 0.75 million USD against 0.62 million USD in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.13 million USD.

That makes Saint Vincent and the Grenadines's figure about 1.2 times Papua New Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.

Papua New Guinea ranks 91st and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 89th of 118 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Papua New Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Papua New Guinea Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Difference Ahead
2010s 8.24 million USD 0.6667 million USD 7.57 million USD Papua New Guinea
2020s 0.23 million USD 0.7567 million USD 0.5267 million USD Saint Vincent and the Grenadines

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher protection of biodiversity and landscape (central government), Papua New Guinea or Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, at 0.75 million USD against 0.62 million USD in Papua New Guinea as of 2024.
What is the difference in protection of biodiversity and landscape (central government) between Papua New Guinea and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
0.13 million USD, with Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
6 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2022.
How do Papua New Guinea and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for protection of biodiversity and landscape (central government)?
Papua New Guinea ranks 91st and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 89th of 118 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (central government expenditure) — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Papua New Guinea vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (central government). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/protection-of-biodiversity-and-landscape-central-government-expenditure-value-us-2015/papua-new-guinea/st-vincent-and-the-grenadines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/protection-of-biodiversity-and-landscape-central-government-expenditure-value-us-2015/papua-new-guinea/st-vincent-and-the-grenadines/">Papua New Guinea vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (central government)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (central government expenditure) — Value US$, 2015 prices
Unit
million USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
127 places, 1,948 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed

The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.