Bulgaria vs Mauritius: Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (central government)
Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (central government) over time
- Bulgaria
- Mauritius
How they compare
Bulgaria currently reports 2.85 million USD against 2.78 million USD in Mauritius, a difference of 0.07 million USD.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Bulgaria ahead.
Bulgaria ranks 73rd and Mauritius ranks 75th of 118 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Bulgaria averaged higher in 2 and Mauritius in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bulgaria | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 13.27 million USD | 0 million USD | 13.27 million USD | Bulgaria |
| 2010s | 4.77 million USD | 8.07 million USD | 3.29 million USD | Mauritius |
| 2020s | 5.17 million USD | 4.79 million USD | 0.3867 million USD | Bulgaria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protection of biodiversity and landscape (central government), Bulgaria or Mauritius?
- Bulgaria, at 2.85 million USD against 2.78 million USD in Mauritius as of 2022.
- What is the difference in protection of biodiversity and landscape (central government) between Bulgaria and Mauritius?
- 0.07 million USD, with Bulgaria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bulgaria and Mauritius?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2022.
- How do Bulgaria and Mauritius rank globally for protection of biodiversity and landscape (central government)?
- Bulgaria ranks 73rd and Mauritius ranks 75th of 118 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (central government expenditure) — Value US$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.