Canada vs Italy: Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (general government)
Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (general government) over time
- Canada
- Italy
How they compare
Italy currently reports 2,878 million SLC against 2,858 million SLC in Canada, a difference of 20 million SLC.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Italy has been ahead every year.
Canada ranks 18th and Italy ranks 17th of 79 countries.
Italy has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Italy | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,339 million SLC | 2,695 million SLC | 1,356 million SLC | Italy |
| 2010s | 1,643 million SLC | 2,457 million SLC | 813.72 million SLC | Italy |
| 2020s | 2,273 million SLC | 2,527 million SLC | 253.41 million SLC | Italy |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protection of biodiversity and landscape (general government), Canada or Italy?
- Italy, at 2,878 million SLC against 2,858 million SLC in Canada as of 2023.
- What is the difference in protection of biodiversity and landscape (general government) between Canada and Italy?
- 20 million SLC, with Italy ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Italy?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2023.
- How do Canada and Italy rank globally for protection of biodiversity and landscape (general government)?
- Canada ranks 18th and Italy ranks 17th of 79 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (general government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.