Egypt vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (general government)

Egypt
936 million SLC
in 2024
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
685 million SLC
in 2023
Egypt rank
34th
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank
36th

Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (general government) over time

  • Egypt
  • United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
2004006008001.0k200120122024

How they compare

Egypt currently reports 936 million SLC against 685 million SLC in United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, a difference of 251 million SLC.

That makes Egypt's figure about 1.4 times United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2013 it was United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ahead.

Egypt ranks 34th and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 36th of 79 countries.

Egypt has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Egypt United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Difference Ahead
2010s 615 million SLC 516 million SLC 99 million SLC Egypt
2020s 729.5 million SLC 523 million SLC 206.5 million SLC Egypt

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher protection of biodiversity and landscape (general government), Egypt or United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
Egypt, at 936 million SLC against 685 million SLC in United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland as of 2024.
What is the difference in protection of biodiversity and landscape (general government) between Egypt and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
251 million SLC, with Egypt ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
11 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2023.
How do Egypt and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank globally for protection of biodiversity and landscape (general government)?
Egypt ranks 34th and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 36th of 79 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (general government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Egypt vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (general government). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/protection-of-biodiversity-and-landscape-general-government-expenditure-value-standard/egypt-arab-rep/united-kingdom-of-great-britain-and-northern-ireland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/protection-of-biodiversity-and-landscape-general-government-expenditure-value-standard/egypt-arab-rep/united-kingdom-of-great-britain-and-northern-ireland/">Egypt vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (general government)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (general government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency
Unit
million SLC
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
82 places, 1,360 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed

The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.