Mongolia vs Poland: Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (general government)
Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (general government) over time
- Mongolia
- Poland
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 1,135 million SLC against 1,024 million SLC in Poland, a difference of 111 million SLC.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times Poland's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Poland ahead.
Mongolia ranks 31st and Poland ranks 32nd of 79 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Mongolia averaged higher in 2 and Poland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 million SLC | 118 million SLC | 118 million SLC | Poland |
| 2010s | 7,604 million SLC | 400.06 million SLC | 7,204 million SLC | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 6,502 million SLC | 797.07 million SLC | 5,705 million SLC | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protection of biodiversity and landscape (general government), Mongolia or Poland?
- Mongolia, at 1,135 million SLC against 1,024 million SLC in Poland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in protection of biodiversity and landscape (general government) between Mongolia and Poland?
- 111 million SLC, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Poland?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.
- How do Mongolia and Poland rank globally for protection of biodiversity and landscape (general government)?
- Mongolia ranks 31st and Poland ranks 32nd of 79 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (general government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.