Japan vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (general government)

Japan
897.49 million USD
in 2023
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
814.56 million USD
in 2023
Japan rank
9th
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank
10th

Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (general government) over time

  • Japan
  • United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
5001.0k1.5k2.0k200120122023

How they compare

Japan currently reports 897.49 million USD against 814.56 million USD in United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, a difference of 82.93 million USD.

That makes Japan's figure about 1.1 times United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Japan ahead.

Japan ranks 9th and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 10th of 79 countries.

Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Japan United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Difference Ahead
2000s 1,036 million USD 863.97 million USD 172.08 million USD Japan
2010s 879.85 million USD 786.29 million USD 93.56 million USD Japan
2020s 710.95 million USD 667.73 million USD 43.22 million USD Japan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher protection of biodiversity and landscape (general government), Japan or United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
Japan, at 897.49 million USD against 814.56 million USD in United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland as of 2023.
What is the difference in protection of biodiversity and landscape (general government) between Japan and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
82.93 million USD, with Japan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
How do Japan and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank globally for protection of biodiversity and landscape (general government)?
Japan ranks 9th and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 10th of 79 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (general government expenditure) — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Japan vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (general government). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/protection-of-biodiversity-and-landscape-general-government-expenditure-value-us-2015/japan/united-kingdom-of-great-britain-and-northern-ireland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/protection-of-biodiversity-and-landscape-general-government-expenditure-value-us-2015/japan/united-kingdom-of-great-britain-and-northern-ireland/">Japan vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (general government)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape (general government expenditure) — Value US$, 2015 prices
Unit
million USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
82 places, 1,360 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed

The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.