Dominican Republic vs Uganda: Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape, Recurrent (central)
Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape, Recurrent (central) over time
- Dominican Republic
- Uganda
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 15.97 million USD against 11.27 million USD in Dominican Republic, a difference of 4.7 million USD.
That makes Uganda's figure about 1.4 times Dominican Republic's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2020 it was Dominican Republic ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 34th and Uganda ranks 31st of 70 countries.
Dominican Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protection of biodiversity and landscape, recurrent (central), Dominican Republic or Uganda?
- Uganda, at 15.97 million USD against 11.27 million USD in Dominican Republic as of 2024.
- What is the difference in protection of biodiversity and landscape, recurrent (central) between Dominican Republic and Uganda?
- 4.7 million USD, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Uganda?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2020 to 2024.
- How do Dominican Republic and Uganda rank globally for protection of biodiversity and landscape, recurrent (central)?
- Dominican Republic ranks 34th and Uganda ranks 31st of 70 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape, Recurrent (central government expenditure) — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.