Sweden vs Trinidad and Tobago: Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape, Recurrent (central)
Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape, Recurrent (central) over time
- Sweden
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 186.79 million USD against 131.87 million USD in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 54.92 million USD.
That makes Sweden's figure about 1.4 times Trinidad and Tobago's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
Sweden ranks 8th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 10th of 70 countries.
Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sweden | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 102.62 million USD | 136.48 million USD | 33.86 million USD | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 2010s | 130.1 million USD | 188.84 million USD | 58.74 million USD | Trinidad and Tobago |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protection of biodiversity and landscape, recurrent (central), Sweden or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Sweden, at 186.79 million USD against 131.87 million USD in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2024.
- What is the difference in protection of biodiversity and landscape, recurrent (central) between Sweden and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 54.92 million USD, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sweden and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2015.
- How do Sweden and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for protection of biodiversity and landscape, recurrent (central)?
- Sweden ranks 8th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 10th of 70 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape, Recurrent (central government expenditure) — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.