Malawi vs Yemen: Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape, Recurrent (central)
Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape, Recurrent (central) over time
- Malawi
- Yemen
How they compare
Yemen currently reports 0.11 million USD against 0 million USD in Malawi, a difference of 0.11 million USD.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Yemen has been ahead every year.
Malawi ranks 68th and Yemen ranks 65th of 70 countries.
Yemen has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Yemen | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 million USD | 0.4567 million USD | 0.4567 million USD | Yemen |
| 2010s | 0.142 million USD | 0.44 million USD | 0.298 million USD | Yemen |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protection of biodiversity and landscape, recurrent (central), Malawi or Yemen?
- Yemen, at 0.11 million USD against 0 million USD in Malawi as of 2014.
- What is the difference in protection of biodiversity and landscape, recurrent (central) between Malawi and Yemen?
- 0.11 million USD, with Yemen ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Yemen?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
- How do Malawi and Yemen rank globally for protection of biodiversity and landscape, recurrent (central)?
- Malawi ranks 68th and Yemen ranks 65th of 70 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Protection of Biodiversity and Landscape, Recurrent (central government expenditure) — Value US$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.